The horrifying world of “Arab” stock photography.
Arabic designers take note: there’s a new awesome tool called Font Face that will greatly improve your life. Get access to tens of nice Arabic fonts, optimized for web.
It’s really simple and really awesome to use. Just filter through the styles on the sidebar, and then you have the option to either download the web font or embed it in your website for loading.
You can also view fonts as headlines or body text in each font view.
I encourage everyone to share a link with their designer friends to Font Face. You’ll make their day, promise! :)
I just found the most amazing website in the world. It beautifully combines three of my top five favorite things in life: science fiction, typography, and the Internet. Basically, it here’s a piece dissecting the typography of “Odyssey 2001” (which happens to be one of my favorite books in the world, by Arthur C Clarke, one of my favorite authors in the world).
It dwells on tiny little things like the old IBM logo designed by Paul Rand, one of my favorite designers in the world.
They also have a beautiful piece on typesetting “Alien” on Typeset in the Future.
I strongly recommend reading it.
Really. What an amazing blog. It’s so beautiful.
Ladies and gentlemen, please meet Swissra, an Arabic typeface that was inspired by Swiss graphic design.
Ali AlMasri, the designer behind the typeface, says that the motivation behind the typeface was to create a neutral and carefully crafted Arabic font family that can be used on many different applications and work in multilingual situations with Swiss fonts such as Akzidenz-grotesk and Helvetica. Swissra is also a tribute to Swiss graphic design.
Technical stuff: Swissra features sharply cut terminals, which are either horizontal or vertical. It also features closed apertures and a high x-height.
Swissra is available in eight weights that range from ultralight to black.
You can buy Swissra from MyFonts.
View complete project on Behance.
For starters, if you really love fonts, you won’t be using the word “fonts” at all. You will use the word “typeface”, which is much more dignified, and well, correct. Calling a typeface a font is like saying “Internet Explorer” when you want to refer to the World Wide Web.
A font — like an mp3 — is what you use. A typeface — like a song — is what you see. This matters. You’ll really appreciate the linguistics, if you really love typefaces.
You’ll also appreciate the details. Oh, the details! They are what make typefaces so beautiful. Some typefaces have counters more beautiful than Zooey Deschanel’s eyes, and others have finials that make your heart melt. You enlarge these typefaces on your screen, appreciating each ear and hairline. You obsess over the ligatures and the tails.
The smallest details make you squeal with delight, because you know it’s these details that will make a typeface render optimally on your screen, or help maintain each letter’s identity when printed on paper. You’ll type “AV” and “f)” and admire the genius of a well-kerned typeface. After all, the theory of visual chaos and randomness holds true with typefaces too. Nothing is ever really random, and simply drawing letters that are mathematically correct yields results that look wrong. So everything is a careful experiment in faking randomness and that just dazzles you. It takes your breath away. It makes your heart shiver slightly.
Typefaces are like movies, in a way. There are some classics that you might not love, but that you know are important, so you appreciate them. You know that Bembo is a 1929 revival of an old-style humanist typeface cut by Francesco Griffo around 1495. It’s a good book face, and that’s really cool. Even cooler is how the 19th century changed typefaces too, where newspaper fonts had lengthened serifs to prevent damage during the printing process (and that’s why we have slab seris like Clarendon).
You love typefaces so much they make you feel things. You can recognize the ones you love from miles away. They are a celebration of detail, functionality, and legibility. All in the smallest, most invisible visual element.
That’s why you get so excited when you stumble upon a new amazing typeface. It feels like Christmas! You instantly download it, lovingly storing it with the rest of your font collection, saved in alphabetical order. You design a few quick things, just for fun. You check it out when it’s really large and really small.
And you excitedly wait for a new project to test it out on.
Usually though, when the project comes, you end up resorting to your favorite typefaces. Your friends laugh when they see you use DIN. But Roba, they say, DIN doesn’t work so well in this project!
Shut up, you say. DIN always works. DIN is my best friend. DIN always looks perfect.
And you want to hug DIN and tell it you love it. It was the first typeface you ever fell in love with. You’ve fallen in love with others over the years too, of course. But it was your first love, when you were young and had just stumbled upon the crazy world of typography.
And that’s what it feels like to really, really love something as invisible as typography.
It feels like… a lot.
I’m really hating this stupid trend of two-column content with endless scrolling.
WTF, I only have one pair of eyes. I can’t read both vertically and horizontally at the same time.
Case in point, Buzzfeed, with THREE columns of information (below). They aren’t categories or anything like that, they’re unrelated modules of content.
But whatever. I’m not often on Buzzfeed so I don’t really care. But then… last week… the sacrilegious happened. Boing Boing, MY FAVORITE BLOG IN THE WORLD reverted to a two-column content layout and I wanted to rip my heart out.
What were they thinking? I can’t scroll down to read ALL the features then scroll back up and scroll back down again to read ALL the blogs. It’s just counter-intuitive. Sadly, comfortable reading is so important to me that I can’t even read my favorite blog anymore :(
It makes me really sad.
Seriously, what’s wrong with the regular one-column-of-content user interface? It works so well. Why break something that works?
But you know what really freaks me out… that I’m getting too old for this shit. Could it be that my eyes are so used to something that I can’t get used to something else? Or is it just horrible UX design?
Page 1 of 42